El
Otoño del Patriarca is one of those
novels of Gabriel García Márquez in which time is moved around and stretched in
any way that fits the narrative. It’s a form of Magic Realism often used by
South American writers of a certain type or period, but he does it in his own
way.
García
Márquez is a storyteller of genius, there are very few who can touch him. Often
when I read a novel I stop after a few chapters because I think, ‘What’s the
point of reading this book when I could have written a better one myself?’ (My
attempt to prove myself right on this point should be in the Amazon store by
the autumn, by the way, very modestly priced.) But when I read GGM I wonder why
I even bother trying.
The patriarch
of the title is a decaying dictator, bloodthirsty and ruthless, but we don't
learn how he gained power and he has little idea what to do with it. It doesn’t
seem to matter very much. He is the leader because someone has to be. At times
his main interest in power is the fact that he can do what he wants without
having to explain himself to anyone. The country is a mess because he's more
interested in his routine than in any of the trappings of power, or in power
itself. He has been the tyrant for decades, they celebrate his hundred years of
power a couple of times. He has a shack full of concubines and their children,
none of whom he cares in the least about, and the palace is full of valuable
objects being spoiled by chickens.
The
banality of his life and the pointlessness of the power he wields go round and
round in time and the characters and the situations come up again and again and
nothing is explained. There are many narrators who are never properly
identified and often switch in mid-sentence for no apparent reason. Some of the
sentences are many pages long without being especially forced. It's good stuff,
although any point it had was made long before the middle and the narrative
purpose could have gone on forever. It's a strange kind of allegory for a
friend of Fidel.
The
‘palace’ is mostly abandoned because he cares nothing for comfort or luxury,
even the comfort of the eye. The only woman he ever loved is long gone, his
mother lived and died in poverty because she never understood that she owned
half the country, and his only friend was an actor, discovered by chance, who
was his exact double, and who took his place when he wanted to be somewhere
else, or was afraid of assassination, or just bored by his duties, and thus a
legend of ubiquity arises around him. The double becomes his confidante because
they are, to most people, the same person. They share the same life exactly, as
they must, they run the same risks, they become identical in every aspect of
their appearance, speech, gestures and character.
The
double is also long dead and when he died the army and the people thought the
tyrant was dead and most of them celebrated. The tyrant watched and waited,
then rounded up and tortured to death many of those who had cheered, and
rewarded opulently those he had seen genuinely mourning him.
The
book doesn’t end, any more than it begins. It’s GGM doing what he does very
well.
3 comments:
The banality of his life and the pointlessness of the power he wields go round and round in time and the characters and the situations come up again and again
Ain't that the way it is? He grasps onto what he has and there's nothing worthwhile there.
Very true.
I remember a version of The Invisible Man from the early nineties in which William Defoe (I think) discovers how to became invisible and uses this extraordinary power to spy on his neighbour undressing. I don't know if that banality was the point of the film or they just didn't have any imagination but it made you want to throw things at the screen. Likewise the dictator's power is useful to him mainly because it stops others from telling him what to do. He himself doesn't know how to use it.
Post a Comment