Apparently people are much exercised about this question.
Unable to satisfy myself on the point I asked a number of people for their
opinion:
Theologians I consulted mostly suggested the church had little
to say on the matter of an exact number, but that the angelic essence was concentrated
at an indefinable point, while simultaneously permeating the entire universe of
heaven and earth. The spokesman for the Church of England suggested that, in
the light of this, the answer was whatever I wanted it to be. The Imam said
that if by angels I meant djinnis, then they did not dance anywhere at all as it
would be contrary to the will of Allah. A Roman Catholic priest said that he
had recently attended a party on the head of a pin at which no fewer than 99
angels were present. It was late in the evening, however, and his testimony is
open to question. Ian Paisley said the answer was the exact opposite of whatever the
Papish infidel had said it was. A passing Salvation Army girl asked me what I was
doing that evening but had nothing to say about angels and pinheads.
A noted philosopher prodded me repeatedly in the chest,
demanding that I define angel, dance, pinhead and prove the reality of numbers greater
than one, rejected the definitions and proofs I gave him, substituted his own,
ignored those as well, argued circularly,
inductively, deductively, collectively, absurdly and ad hominem, declared at
one point that no angels were Scotsmen, invoked and abused the shades of
colleagues long dead, argued himself into and out of a corner on at least three
occasions, and finally pronounced that the answer was somewhere between zero and infinity,
depending on the nature of conceptual reality.
A spokesman for Dave Spart said that the removal of both angel
production and dance teaching from the hands of rapacious capitalism had led to
ever-increasing numbers of angels dancing on pinheads. He proved this by
showing me an envelope which, he said, had that very morning held dozens of
such pins with innumerable forms gyrating upon them.
A health and safety officer informed me that no angels could
dance on a pinhead because it was forbidden. When I asked her to consider the
matter independently of legal restraints she looked at me closely, pressed a
leaflet into my hand and said she would around later to inspect my pins and
test me on my knowledge of the relevant legislation.
87% of the statisticians I asked returned an answer that was
within two standard deviations of 17. However, evidence suggests this is true
of almost all questions put to statisticians. (For some value of almost).
A hippy said ‘wow’ repeatedly, while staring, mesmerized, at
the head of a pin on which I, personally, could see nothing, Terpsichorean or
otherwise. ‘Wow, man, there’s millions of them.’ He would not commit himself to
a more precise figure, therefore all we can say is that he might have provided
an order of magnitude for the lower bound.
Tony Blair stated through a spokesman who refused to give
his name that, after consultation with Peter Mandelson and others, he knew
nothing of any angels or pinheads, that it was a matter of collective
responsibility in Cabinet subject to the immunity of office and anyway, he
wasn’t there. I naturally accept his word on all these points.
Silvio Berlusconi did not feel competent to address the
question, but, on being pressed, began to muse, almost to himself, “big enough
and wide enough, maybe fifty, maybe sixty; very slim, very little clothes,
maybe 70”, and hung up excitedly, thanking me for the idea I had given him for
his next orgy.
Richard Dawkins was unavailable for comment.
I conclude from all of this that the field is scandalously
under-researched and I have applied for a grant to spend the next three years
investigating angels, pinheads, and the spatial and temporal relations between
them. Artists can’t answer the question either, but they are in agreement that the
clothing of angels is limited to wisps of diaphanous material that drifts across
them in not quite random fashion. Between that and the dancing, I expect my
research to be exhausting as well as exhaustive. I shall, of course, keep my
readers informed.
7 comments:
This topic has passed its sell-by date by several hundred years. The satire is therefore misplaced. I hope you can be more specific and up to date!
I find your comment deflating, as I produced my little satire with pleasure and enthusiasm. But I have to admit you are right. I shall see if I can find a more up-to-date target for my wit.
Now I have mixed feelings: regret to have spoiled the fun, but hope that I may have spurred you to new targets and more essays in the abject self-promotion genre.
The post was little more than a whimsical thought, that might have been dropped into a light-hearted conversation, tortured beyond endurance. A little humorous fun, but, you're quite right, not worth posting here.
I feel spurred, and hope to be able to respond to that spurring.
They've better things to be doing than dancing on pinheads.
exceedingly excellent are your musings but you should have taken the Sally Army girl's offer to help soothe your furrowed brow
p.s.
all angels are Scottish
JH
But what do they do all day except praise God and guard mortals? Could be a fulltime job though.
JD
Ahh the Sally Ann girl. What memories... And I shall add your information about Scottish angels to my research.
Post a Comment